Artikelaktionen

Sie sind hier: Startseite Universität im … Veranstaltungskalender FRIAS Lunch Lecture Series | …

FRIAS Lunch Lecture Series | | Which Forecast to trust? Credibility and craftmanship in environmental modelling

Which Forecast to trust? Credibility and craftmanship in environmental modelling
Wann 09.01.2020
von 12:00 bis 13:00
Wo HS 1009, KG I, Universität Freiburg
Name
Teilnehmer (Prof. Dr. Carsten Dormann, Universität Freiburg)
Termin übernehmen vCal
iCal


Referent/Referentin:
Prof. Dr. Carsten Dormann (Universität Freiburg)

Termin:
Donnerstag, 09.01.2020, 12:00 Uhr - 13:00 Uhr

Ort:
HS 1009, KG I, Universität Freiburg

Termin übernehmen:
vCal iCal

Ausführliche Beschreibung:

Forecasts, here understood as quantitative predictions of the future state of a system, come in all shapes and sizes. The German "economic wise guys" forecast next year's economic growth, the evening news present the three-day weather forecast, climate scientists predict drought conditions in 2100, and ecologists forecast loss of diversity following land-use and climate change. The forecasts communicated to the public typically come in maps or simple line graphs or single numbers. Assumptions, data quality and forecast uncertainty are never communicated. Within each community, however, these are fundamental for the credibility of a modelling approach; the forecasts are often merely the spin on the actual science for a more widely disseminated publication. In some areas of environmental science, however, forecasts are all there is: a predicted time-trend, a map, emerging from a short analysis without thorough scientific evaluation of uncertainties, explicit statement of assumptions, discussion of potential errors or alternative scenarios. And, indeed, without any scientific merit. This kind of science is largely politically motivated, its scientific credibility is rather low. After giving some examples of the current range of environmental forecasts, I want to present a few lines along which to identify, as a person outside the actual field, the scientific quality and hence credibility of an environmental forecast.

 
 


Interne Verantwortlichkeit:
FRIAS Allgemeiner Geschäftsbetrieb

Kontaktperson:
Name: Verena Schröter
E-Mail: verena.schroeter@frias.uni-freiburg.de

kolloquien_uie-veranstaltungsart forst-und-umwelt_uie-themengebiet 2000000000_uie-organisation 2002700011_uie-institut

Forecasts, here understood as quantitative predictions of the future state of a system, come in all shapes and sizes. The German "economic wise guys" forecast next year's economic growth, the evening news present the three-day weather forecast, climate scientists predict drought conditions in 2100, and ecologists forecast loss of diversity following land-use and climate change. The forecasts communicated to the public typically come in maps or simple line graphs or single numbers. Assumptions, data quality and forecast uncertainty are never communicated. Within each community, however, these are fundamental for the credibility of a modelling approach; the forecasts are often merely the spin on the actual science for a more widely disseminated publication. In some areas of environmental science, however, forecasts are all there is: a predicted time-trend, a map, emerging from a short analysis without thorough scientific evaluation of uncertainties, explicit statement of assumptions, discussion of potential errors or alternative scenarios. And, indeed, without any scientific merit. This kind of science is largely politically motivated, its scientific credibility is rather low. After giving some examples of the current range of environmental forecasts, I want to present a few lines along which to identify, as a person outside the actual field, the scientific quality and hence credibility of an environmental forecast.

 
 
abgelegt unter: